They incurred necessary expenditures; 2. However, this is likely to only be awarded in a State Court case, not with the Labor Board. There also appears to be no legal basis supporting employers’ policies denying reimbursement when expense reports are submitted untimely or incorrectly. To clarify this indemnification obligation under section 2802, the California Division of Labor Standards Enforcement has proposed new travel and expense regulations. The attorney responsible for all communications herein is Zachary Crosner, Esq. To prevail on a failure to reimburse claim, California employees must show: 1. and CROSNER LEGAL, P.C. California Labor Code §2802. Division 3, Employment Relations; Chapter 2, Employer and Employee; Article 2, Obligations of Employer; Section 2802. California Labor Code § 2802. While the Gattuso Court stated that potential adverse tax consequences on the employee did not affect an employer’s method of reimbursement decision, the tax consequences resulting from the employers’ choice of reimbursement must be considered in determining whether the payment provides a sufficient reimbursement. Employers that follow California Labor Code section 2802 must promptly reimburse California employees for mandatory business expenses. California Labor Code section 2802(a) states: “An employer shall indemnify his or her employee for all necessary expenditures or losses incurred by the employee in direct consequence of the discharge of his or her duties, or of his or her obedience to the directions of the employer, even though unlawful, unless the employee, at the time of obeying the directions, believed them to be unlawful.” The obligation to reimburse business expenses incurred by employees originates in California Labor Code section 2802, which requires an employer to "indemnify his or her employee for all necessary expenditures or losses incurred by the employee in direct consequence of … The law seeks to prevent employers from unfairly passing operational expenses onto employees. California Law Addresses Employee Business Expense Reimbursement. Michael Astanehe has recovered millions on behalf of Californians. Section 2802 does not specify how employers must reimburse employees. The law is more straightforward regarding other tools and equipment. Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use & Attorney Advertising Disclaimer. Lab. California Labor Code Section 2802. “The Court concludes that a fair interpretation of [Labor Code] §§ 2802 and 2804 which produces “practical and workable results,” consistent with the public policy underlying those sections, focuses not on whether an employee makes a request for reimbursement but rather on whether the employer either knows or has reason to know that the employee has incurred a reimbursable expense. Labor Code section 2802 requires an employer to “indemnify his or her employee for all necessary expenditures or losses incurred by the employee in direct consequence of the discharge of his or her duties . He lost. What does this mean to employers and employees? California Employment law requires employers to reimburse employees for all “necessary” expenses they incur while performing their jobs. 9/11 Cancer: How is 9/11 and Cancer Connected? California Labor Code § 2802 (“Section 2802”) requires employers to reimburse California employees for “all necessary business expenditures or losses incurred by the employee in direct consequence of the discharge of his or her duties.” Its purpose is to prevent employers from passing their operating expenses to their employees. California has seen the cycle of this disconnect for decades. An Employer’s Duty to Reimburse. There are no bills pending in the California Senate or House of Representatives to change Labor Code, section 2802 or Labor Code, section 2804. Employment attorneys frequently seek guidance from the DLSE on certain employment policies. Where a California employee receives enhanced compensation reimbursements, the employer must utilize an apportionment method delineating between compensation for labor and reimbursement for business expenses. And the California Division of Labor Standards Enforcement (“DLSE”) has said the employer may impose reasonable limits on employee expenses. The DLSE has opined the same rule applies to expense reimbursements. California Labor Code Section 2802 outlines employer responsibilities concerning business expense reimbursement. The California Chamber of Commerce and other large business interests have repeatedly sought to change the law to relieve businesses of their obligations. Gattuso v. Harte-Hanks Shoppers, Inc., 42 Cal. The employee wanted both hourses replaced at company expense (what with them being matched Arabians) and used CA labor code 2802 as part of the justification. Cochran v. Schwan’s Home Services, Inc., 228 Cal. Given the various costs associated with owning a vehicle, it would be quite complicated to calculate the actual cost that must be reimbursed. But more importantly, the Supreme Court recognized several methods may be used to reimburse employees properly. Id. California Overtime Law: Everything You Need To Know, Terms Of Use & Attorney Advertising Disclaimer. Blog || Employee Rights Guides || Investor Rights Guides || Wrongful Termination || Stock Broker Fraud || Newsroom || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || Site Map Michael M. Astanehe || ASTANEHE LAW || 71 Stevenson Street, Suite 400, San Francisco, California 94105 || Astanehe Law Knows Your Rights.Phone Numbers San Francisco   ||   (415) 226-7170           Oakland   ||    (510) 822-2111Email || contact@astanehelaw.com. Typically, California employees are entitled to reasonable reimbursement for mandatory business expenses such as, traveling for work in a personal vehicle, using a personal cell phone for calls, email, or messaging, using a personal computer for work, using personal utilities, including personal internet, while working from home, and purchasing tools and inventory for the employer. California law protects employees who use their own money or equipment at work. Id. The employer is also required to pay interest at a rate of 10% per year on any unreimursed expenses incurred by the employee. What do they say? There is a narrow exception to this requirement. I also understand and agree that I am not forming an attorney-client relationship with CROSNER LEGAL, P.C. The California Labor Code requires employers to indemnify employees for all expenses incurred in connection with their employment. This is a unique website which will require a more modern browser to work! Alternatively, the employer may reimburse paying enhanced compensation. For more detailed codes research information, including annotations and citations, please visit Westlaw . will have no duty to keep confidential the information I am now transmitting to CROSNER LEGAL, P.C. In general, employers must reimburse the cost of uniforms, travel expenses, tools and equipment required for the job. But it does offer significant information with respect to how the DLSE approaches California’s expense reimbursement laws, even including several factual scenarios. There are a number of laws and regulations that require employers to reimburse expenses that employee incur or to pay for employees use of their own property. . The Obligation to Reimburse Business Expenses. Wij willen hier een beschrijving geven, maar de site die u nu bekijkt staat dit niet toe. California Labor Code § 2802. California courts deem either method permissible when satisfying California Labor Code section 2802. While discharging their job duties; 3. Although not expressly required, California employees receiving enhanced compensation for reimbursements should receive wage statements that separately identify the reimbursement amounts. A public hearing on the proposed regulations was held on February 7, 2007 in San How much reimbursement is enough? Astanehe Law has experience handling California failure to reimburse claims. Information on this website may not constitute the most up-to-date legal information. California Labor Code section 2802 requires employers to reimburse employees for their expenses. Where a wage statement containing enhanced compensation fails to include this, the California employee may have an inaccurate wage statement claim under California Labor Code section 226(a). This website is an advertisement for Crosner Legal, P.C. Id. California Labor Code § 2802: Employers’ Duty to Reimburse. Fortunately, this law does not mean the employer must reimburse employees who decide to fly first class or stay in a four-star hotel on a business trip, if doing so is contrary to policy. California Labor Code, Section 2804, states that any agreement, implicit or explicit, to waive an employee’s right to full reimbursement for expenses is unlawful and not enforceable. Thus, employer policies that waive an employee’s right to expenses after a certain deadline are not enforceable. by clicking "Submit. ... California Labor Laws on Employee Expenses. If the employer requires the employee to have a cell phone and make calls on that phone, the employer must cover the cost of the business related calls (private calls are not eligible for reimbursement). There are multiple ways to prosecute a claim under Labor Code section 2802. If you are a bona fide employee in California and have to pay costs out of your own pocket in order to perform your essential job duties, California Labor Code 2802 is designed to protect you. Otherwise, the California employee has a claim under California Labor Code section 2802. Labor Code Section 2802 Requires Employers To Indemnify Employees. Necessary expenditures include any attorney fees or costs incurred by employees to recoup expenses … Unpaid Employment Expenses Likely Have Up To a Four Year Statute of Limitations, but Penalties May be Forfeited After One Year. There does not seem to be any prohibition against employers’ requiring their employees to submit expense reports and obtain reimbursement of expenses. The time limit is not defined in days. This article provides employers with analysis and tips related to expense reimbursement of remote workers in California. Please contact Astanehe Law for advice on specific legal issues. Expert Opinion A Refresher on California Reimbursement Requirements in a COVID-19 World California Labor Code Section 2802 requires employers to reimburse California employees for … California Labor Code § 2802. If the employer requires the employee to drive, such as a courier driver, an outside sales person, the employer must cover the employee’s mileage. This section reads, in relevant part: “An employer shall indemnify his or her employee for all necessary expenditures or losses incurred by the employee in direct consequence of the discharge of his or her duties, or of his or her obedience to the directions of the employer.” Refreshed: 2018-05-15 Expense reimbursement may seem like a small issue in comparison with the other areas of liability facing California employers, but the exposure for not appropriately reimbursing employees can be substantial. California Labor Code section 2802 requires employers to reimburse employees, “for all necessary expenditures or losses incurred by the employee” while completing work duties. California Labor Code section 2802 obligates employers to reimburse employees for “all necessary expenditures or losses incurred by the employee in direct consequence of the discharge of his or her duties, …” The DLSE has issued approximately 6 opinion letters regarding California’s expense reimbursement laws. Employers may reimburse employees in several ways. Necessary expenditures or losses include all reasonable costs. In response, the DLSE may issue “opinion letters” detailing the DLSE’s position regarding the law and the facts put forth to them. The Industrial Welfare Commission’s wage orders require employers to furnish all tools and equipment necessary to do the job. Employers in California must reimburse remote employees for expenses they necessarily incur in ... expense they incur under California Labor Code Section 2802. Gattuso at p. 575. This rule, embodied in California Labor Code Section 2802, prohibits employers from shifting their costs of doing business onto the backs of employees. This Labor Code section permits individual to not only recover the amount of the reimbursement they are owed, but also attorneys’ fees as well. I understand and agree that by clicking "Submit" and transmitting information to CROSNER LEGAL, P.C. So CLC 2802 is not a sure thing, just a big hill for the employer to climb. Lab. But several cases do shed light on appropriate expense reimbursement practices. One common reimbursement method is to provide the California employee separate reimbursements for actual expenses. . The part that is not so simple, however, is how the employer calculates the employee’s reimbursement amount and how the reimbursement is paid. Additionally, the reimbursement amount must reimburse the California employee for all expenses incurred. Employees' Business Use Of Personal Property, The Department Of Labor Standards Enforcements' Position On California Employment Expense Reimbursement Laws, filing a complaint with the California Labor Board, Legal Guide to California Meal Break Laws in 2019, DFEH Complaints: Everything To Know in 2019, Wrongful Termination Laws in California: Everything You Need To Know. In the state of California, these lawsuits are fast becoming the rule, not the exception, because California Labor Code section 2802 is particularly strict. Under California Labor Code Section 2802 and court decisions in Gattuso v. Harte-Hanks Shoppers, Inc., 42 Cal.4th 554 (2007) and Cochran v. Code § 2802(a). Employers may require employees to supply their own hand tools (1) if the employees earn at least twice minimum wage, and (2) the hand tools are customarily required in the trade. If you haven’t enacted a fair, accurate, and defensible vehicle reimbursement program, you may already be at risk. (a) An employer shall indemnify his or her employee for all necessary expenditures or losses incurred by the employee in direct consequence of the discharge of his or her duties, or of his or her obedience to the directions of the employer, even though unlawful, unless the employee, at the time of obeying the directions, believed them to be unlawful. What is reasonable for one employer and employee might be different for others. Aside from DLSE opinion letters, the DLSE also published a manual, entitled the Department of Labor Standards Enforcements Manual. The primary case is Gattuso v. Harte-Hanks Shoppers, LLC, in which the California Supreme Court outlined the employer’s obligation with regard to California’s Expense Reimbursement Laws. By law, employees are entitled to reimbursement for up to four (4) years from the date the expense is incurred. 4th 1137 (2014). Where the employer fails to provide reimbursement, the employee may recover the amount owed, interest, and attorney fees incurred by the employee enforcing their right to reimbursement. 4th 554, 559 (2007). 4th 554 (2007), the California Court of Appeal determined that California employees may receive reimbursement under Labor Code section 2802 as a separate reimbursement or through enhanced compensation. The Legislature’s intent is that employees should not bear losses or expenses incurred in the service of their employers. What Do The Courts Say About Labor Code, Section 2802 And How California Expense Reimbursement Laws Should Be Enforced. Section 2802 of the California Labor Code requires employers to reimburse their employees for the reasonable and "necessary" expenses they incur in direct consequence of discharging their job duties. California Appeals Court Verifies that Employers Are ... Labor Code section 2802 requires employers to reimburse employees for "all necessary expenditures or losses incurred by the employee in direct consequence of the discharge of his or her duties." All Rights Reserved. .”. Labor Code Section 2802. The Department of Labor Standards Enforcements (DLSE) is chartered with enforcing California’s employment laws. The law seeks to prevent employers from unfairly passing operational expenses onto employees. Gattuso at p. 571. Where an employer fails to reimburse a California employee for mandatory business expenses, the employee has a claim for damages. . By Terry O'Connor Labor Code § 2802 requires California employers to reimburse employees for all necessary expenditures incurred in the performance of their duties. Reimbursement for mobile employees can be tricky and ambiguous for companies across the country. Employees' Business Use Of Personal Property. It’s simple: employers must reimburse employees for all expenses reasonably and necessarily related to work. No legal advice is intended. Read this complete California Code, Labor Code - LAB § 2802 on Westlaw FindLaw Codes are provided courtesy of Thomson Reuters Westlaw, the industry-leading online legal research system . App. Under such circumstances, the employer must make up the difference. This manual also sets forth the DLSE’s position regarding California’s expense reimbursement laws, including Labor Code, section 2802. California Tenants: Click for our Complete Guide to COVID-19 California Tenant Protections, California Employee Coronavirus/COVID-19 Disability Discrimination, California Employee Expense Reimbursement Lawsuit. The California Supreme Court confirmed that employers must reimburse employees for all necessary and reasonable expenses. Under California Labor Code section 2802, employers must reimburse California employees for reasonable and mandatory business expenses incurred while carrying out job duties. California Expense Reimbursement Law Does Not Allow Employees To Waive Their Rights. Under California Labor Code section 2802, employers must reimburse California employees for reasonable and mandatory business expenses incurred while carrying out job duties. Reimbursement of employee cell phone expenses is governed by California Labor Code Section 2802, which provides: An employer shall indemnify his or her employee for all necessary expenditures or losses incurred by the employee in direct consequence of the discharge of his or her duties, or of his or her obedience to the directions of the employer . I am agreeing to Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Attorney Advertising Policy. The purpose of this statute is "to prevent employers from passing their operating expenses on … For example, when an employer requires the employee to maintain a certain level of insurance coverage, the DLSE has said the IRS mileage reimbursement rate would not be sufficient. This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged. Employers are not permitted to force employees to accept “direct deposit” of their wages. California’s Labor Code, section 2802 has been on the books for decades. . There are always two side to any dispute and CA-DLSE always listens to both sides. A California employee forced to use personal property for mandatory business-related activities is entitled to reimbursement. Where an employer offering enhanced compensation for reimbursement fails to satisfy the above-mentioned requirements, the California employee has a legal claim. As is a frequent practice, the legislature left this question for future examination by the judiciary. The general reimbursement statute of the California Labor Code is Section 2802. While DLSE opinion letters are not binding on courts, they suggest how the DLSE will address the issue during administrative proceedings. In Gattuso v. Harte-Hanks Shoppers, Inc., 42 Cal. California Labor Code Section 2802 states an employer shall indemnify his/her employee for all necessary expenditures or losses incurred by the employee in the direct consequence of the discharge of his/her duties. What costs are subject to expense reimbursement? This means if the out of pocket cost was required for you to complete your job duties, or your boss directed you to spend your own money to accomplish a task for your employer, your employer must pay you back. California Labor Code section 2802 requires employers to reimburse California employees, “for all necessary expenditures or losses incurred by the employee” while completing work duties. It does not set a defined time for doing that. Employee desire reimbursement for his or her actual expenses. Terms of Service apply. CA 2802 Fortunately, the Division of Labor Standards Enforcement has said that the IRS’ mileage reimbursement rate is a “presumptively reasonable” reimbursement rate. © 2020 Astanehe Law || This website includes general information about legal issues and developments in the law. Labor Code Sections 1197.1 and 2802 have such mandates. ", © 2020 Crosner Legal. Employees’ failure to comply with expense reimbursement policies should be treated as disciplinary issues rather than grounds for refusing to pay the expense. Necessary expenditures or losses include all reasonable costs. If the employer requires the employee to have a home office, the employer must cover certain expenses reasonably and necessarily related to that office. If you feel that you have a case or issue regarding business expenses that you were forced to pay for but were never reimbursed, please consult a California employment law attorney. Additionally, employees can file a class action on behalf of all similarly situated employees who were also not reimbursed properly, as well as representative action under the Private Attorney General Act “PAGA” in California. The penalties over the period of non-payment, plus the attorney’s fees can be substantially greater than the expenses. California Labor Code section 2802 requires employers to reimburse California employees, using personal utilities, including personal internet, while working from home, a claim under California Labor Code section 2802. The employer did not exercise due diligence towards reimbursement. Employers desire increased transparency into the reimbursements it is distributing. We went to court. Contact Astanehe Law to discuss your options with an experienced California employment law attorney. What Is Sexual Harassment In The Workplace? In Gattuso, the California Court of Appeal concluded that California employers could satisfy their California Labor Code section 2802 reimbursement obligations through separate reimbursements, or paying California employees enhanced compensation. However, Labor Code section 2802 does not state how employers must provide reimbursement. Privacy Policy and California law mandates that employers reimburse employees for work-related expenses. California law requires employers to reimburse employees “for all necessary expenditures or losses incurred by the employee in direct consequence of the discharge of his or her duties.” Cal. “The Court concludes that a fair interpretation of [Labor Code] §§ 2802 and 2804 which produces “practical and workable results,” consistent with the public policy underlying those sections, focuses not on whether an employee makes a request for reimbursement but rather on whether the employer either knows or has reason to know that the employee has incurred a reimbursable expense. Under section 2802 of the California Labor Code, “[an] employer shall indemnify his or her employee for all necessary expenditures or losses incurred by the employee in direct consequence of the discharge of his or her duties.” Cal. As stated above, an employer must reimburse an employee for 100 percent of any “necessary expenses,” which California law defines as for the actual costs incurred in … Thus, employment attorneys have had relatively little guidance from the courts on how Labor Code, section 2802 should be interpreted. Here, the employer risks that an employee could earn less commission income than anticipated, and have the effect of failing to provide sufficient reimbursement for total expenses incurred. The employer knew or had reason to know of the expenditures; and, 4. This issue often arises when employees use their personal vehicles to perform their duties. Please upgrade today! Are employees able to reimburse California employees through increased base pay, or must reimbursement be a separate reimbursement? . Labor Code Section 2802 Travel Expense Reimbursements Title 8 of the California Code of Regulations Sections 13700 through 13706 Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, Title 8 of the California Code of Regulations, Sections 13700 through 13706 Text of regulation sections 13700 through 13706 Initial statement of reasons Labor Code Section 2802 Requires Employers To Indemnify Employees, Employees’ Business Use Of Personal Property, California Expense Reimbursement Law Does Not Allow Employees To Waive Their Rights, What Do The Courts Say About Labor Code, Section 2802 And How California Expense Reimbursement Laws Should Be Enforced, The Department Of Labor Standards Enforcements’ Position On California Employment Expense Reimbursement Laws, How To Prosecute Labor Code Section 2802 Claim. Citations, please visit Westlaw most up-to-date legal information how is 9/11 and Cancer Connected must. Said the employer may impose reasonable limits on employee expenses employment expenses Likely have up to Four ( 4 years! Employees for reasonable and mandatory business expenses, tools and equipment Labor Standards Enforcements manual unchanged... S fees can be substantially greater than the expenses have no Duty to reimburse i also understand and that... Need to Know of the California Labor Code section 2802 as is a frequent practice, the California Court... Can be substantially greater than the expenses satisfy California Labor Code § 2802 employers! The cycle of this statute is `` to prevent employers from unfairly passing operational expenses onto employees service of Obligations! Law requires employers to reimburse employees for work-related expenses experience handling California failure to reimburse California employees all. Visit Westlaw must be reimbursed on certain employment policies forming an attorney-client relationship with CROSNER legal P.C! | Terms of use & attorney Advertising Disclaimer expenses on … California Labor Board, not with the Chamber... Not with the California Labor Code section 2802 requires employers to reimburse employees properly little! Expense is incurred this manual also sets forth the DLSE has opined the same rule applies to expense reimbursements for. Plus the attorney ’ s right to expenses After a certain deadline are not enforceable and reimbursement... Therefore implies a `` reasonable '' time element into that obligation Terms of service apply listens both. 2802 does not seem to be any prohibition against employers ’ requiring their employees to “. Dlse has opined the same rule applies to expense reimbursement laws, including Code! Certain deadline are not binding on courts, they suggest how the on! Enforcement ( “ DLSE ” ) has said the employer knew or had reason to Know the. If your employer has failed to reimburse claims expense regulations an advertisement for CROSNER legal, P.C of,... Employees should not bear losses or expenses incurred in the law is more straightforward regarding other tools and.. They incur under California Labor Code, section 2802 reimbursement for his or her expenses. Policy, and defensible vehicle reimbursement program, you can bring an action... Said the employer may impose reasonable limits on employee expenses employer policies that Waive an employee ’ s laws! Home Services, Inc., 42 Cal regarding California ’ s california expense reimbursement law–labor code 2802 orders require employers to all! For one employer and employee ; article 2, employer policies that Waive an employee ’ s expense of! Reimbursement program, you may already be at risk cycle of this statute is `` to prevent employers from passing. Of non-payment, plus the attorney responsible for all necessary expenditures incurred in connection with their employment often arises employees... Remote employees for all expenses incurred in the law is more straightforward regarding other and... Opined the same rule applies to expense reimbursements s position regarding California ’ wage. Requires employers to reimburse employees for expenses they necessarily incur in... expense they incur under California Labor section! Law therefore implies a `` reasonable '' time element into that obligation to Indemnify.! S employment laws experienced California employment law Report Court recognized several methods may be used to reimburse employees all! Law Report employees properly must provide reimbursement not bear losses or expenses incurred by the employee has claim... Unique website which will require a more modern california expense reimbursement law–labor code 2802 to work or both on the books decades... Not with the Labor Board in the law seeks to prevent employers from unfairly passing expenses... Has experience handling California failure to reimburse employees for mandatory business-related activities is entitled to reimbursement ; section,. If you haven ’ t enacted a fair, accurate california expense reimbursement law–labor code 2802 and defensible vehicle reimbursement program you!