Ms Michael’s family and estate brought claims against the Chief Constables of the Gwent Police and the South Wales Police for Michael and Others v South Wales Police and Another: CA 20 Jul 2012. In Scotland, JUSTICE is known as ‘JUSTICE Scotland’ Charity No SC043518. At the time relevant to … Ms Michael lived in the area of South Wales Police, but the call was picked up by a telephone mast in Gwent and rerouted to the Gwent Police call centre. Michael v Chief Constable of South Wales [2015] UKSC 2. In he article Nicholas McBride considers the judgment of the Supreme Court in Michael v Chief Constable of South Wales Police [2015] UKSC 2. 1495. New Judgment: Michael & Ors v The Chief Constable of South Wales Police & Anor [2015] UKSC 2. Michael and Others v The Chief Constable of South Wales Police and Another: SC 28 Jan 2015 The claimants asserted negligence in the defendant in failing to provide an adequate response to an emergency call, leading, they said to the death of their daughter at the hands of her violent partner. Case ID. SWP is the first force in Wales, and only a handful in the UK to introduce this. South Wales Police's Special Constabulary recruits every 6 months. When giving the South Wales Police an abbreviated version of events, the call handler did not reference the threat to kill and the priority of the call was downgraded to ‘G2’: officers should respond within 60 minutes. Lord Neuberger, Lady Hale, Lord Mance, Lord Kerr, Lord Reed, Lord Toulson, Lord Hodge. He told her that he was going to kill her. Neutral citation number [2015] UKSC 2. Michael & Ors v The Chief Constable of South Wales Police & Anor, heard 28 July 2014. © 2020 JUSTICE. 28 Jan 2015 . Michael & Ors v South Wales Police & Anor England and Wales Court of Appeal (Civil Division) (20 Jul, 2012) 20 Jul, 2012; Subsequent References; ... Mr Nicholas Bowen QC, placing some reliance on the remarks of Arden LJ in An Informer v A Chief Constable [2012] EWCA Civ 197 paras 93 … O'Brien v Chief Constable of South Wales Police [2005] UKHL 26 was an English evidence law decision of the House of Lords which held that evidence of previous bad behaviour, known as similar fact evidence, may be admitted in civil case proceedings if it is probative of a relevant matter. Visit our site to read our latest news and appeals, find crime prevention advice or tell us about non-urgent incidents or crimes. Judgment (PDF) Press summary (PDF) Judgment on BAILII (HTML version) … He told her that he was going to kill her. Join the JUSTICE mailing list and receive occasional, important updates about our work. It was heard by Mr. Justice Woolf. [37] All the case law referenced precluded such a liability under common law. This is a review of the case: R (on the application of Edward Bridges) v the Chief Constable of South Wales Police [2020] EWCA Civ 1058.It was before the Master of the Rolls Sir Terence Etherton, the President of the Queen’s Bench Division Dame Victoria Sharp, and Lord Justice Singh, in … Michael v Chief Constable of South Wales Police [2015] UKSC 2 Summary Joanna Michael lived in St Mellons, near the south coast of Wales. Hill v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire [1988] 1 QB 60 was the well-known case brought by the mother of the last murder victim of Peter Sutcliffe, the ‘Yorkshire Ripper’. We can't give advice, but these organisations may be able to help you. The proceedings arose as a result of a failure by police services to intervene in time to prevent a woman from being murdered. Michael and others (FC) (Appellants) v The Chief Constable of South Wales Police and another (Respondents) Judgment (PDF) Press summary (PDF) IPCC Final Report 2010: The Independent Police Complaints Commission investigated the Police role and issued a critical report (17 pages pdf). LORD BINGHAM OF CORNHILL. i. i.e. Case: Michael v Chief Constable of South Wales Police [2015] UKSC 2. Welcome to the South Wales Police website. Case Law: R (Bridges) v Chief Constable of South Wales Police: The use of facial recognition software by the police is lawful – Suneet Sharma September 6, 2019 / INFORRM / 2 Comments On 4 September 2019 the Administrative Court (Haddon-Cave LJ and Swift J) handed down judgment in the case of R (Bridges) v Chief Constable of the South Wales Police [2019] EWHC 2341 (Admin) . Judgment (PDF) Press summary (PDF) Minority view, Lord Kerr and Baroness Hale: Held that there should be sufficient proximity where certain elements exist. o Lord Kerr: Public not having to protect others from 3rd parties doesn’t apply to the police, who have been empowered to protect the public from harm. Michael and others (Appellants) v The Chief Constable of South Wales Police and another (Respondents) [2015] UKSC 2. Assignment Speaking about the duty of care in Michael and Others v Chief Constable of South Wales Police and Another [2015] UKSC 2, Lord Toulson remarked that ‘[f]rom time to time the courts have looked for some universal formula or yardstick [for determining whether a duty of care is owed], but the quest has been elusive’ [103]. Michael and others v The Chief Constable of South Wales Police and another UKSC 2 (28 January 2015) | Practical Law Michael and others v The Chief Constable of South Wales Police and another UKSC 2 (28 January 2015) Legal updates on this case Majority of Supreme Court refuses to … 22 Corringe v Calderdale Metropolitan Borough Council [2004] UKHL 15 and [2004] 1 WLR 1057. policy considerations are being used as a core analytical tool to determine duty of care, rather the Caparo test 31 . Michael v Chief Constable of South Wales [2015] UKSC 2, per Lord Toulson, 27. Such claims can be brought in the domestic courts under the Human Rights Act (HRA) 1998. My Lords, 1. In he article Nicholas McBride considers the judgment of the Supreme Court in Michael v Chief Constable of South Wales Police [2015] UKSC 2. i) A closeness of association between C and D, may come into existence where info is communicated to D. ii) Info should convey serious harm is likely to befall V if urgent action is not taken. View on Westlaw or start a FREE TRIAL today, Michael v Chief Constable of South Wales [2012] EWCA Civ 981 (20 July 2012), PrimarySources C Bren­nan, Tort Law (3 rd edn, Ox­ford Uni­ver­sity Press 2015). o Lady Hale: Policy reasons against the imposition of a duty have diminished; police already owe a duty at common law, positive duty in public law and HR claims, Principle: This case was possibly a turning point due to strong dissenting judgements of Kerr and Hale, who said the time for police immunity was up; also gave leave to apply to Strasbourg. [181]. Some of the difficulties caused by adhering to the duty of care can be seen in the conceptual inconsistencies between the recent Supreme Court decision in Michael v The Chief Constable of South Wales Police UKSC 2 and the otherwise continued erosion of … Michael v Chief Con­sta­ble of South Wales Po­lice UKSC 2; AC 1732, 1761G. For some reason, the call was mis-routed and was picked up by a police phone mast in a neighbouring county, Gwent. Critically evaluate the above proposition, with reference to relevant case law. Duncan Fairgrieve of 1 Crown Office Row was part of the team of counsel representing the appellants in this case. All rights reserved. Hill v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire. The claimant alleged the police had made a number of mistakes in their investigation and should have arrested the murderer before he had the opportunity to murder her daughter. “…provided it is fair, just and reasonable that a duty should arise, police will be liable where they have failed to prevent foreseeable injury to an individual which they could have prevented, and there is a sufficient proximity of relationship between them and the injured person.”[Para 149]. House of Lords. She had sought assistance four times previously. Michael v Chief Constable of South Wales Police is arguably the third most important case - after Donoghue v Stevenson (1932) and Hedley Byrne v Heller & Partners (1964) - on the English law of negligence to be decided by the UK's highest court. For example, the Court drew attention to Hill v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire, where a claim was brought against the police by the mother of the last victim of a notorious murderer. He has had nothing to do with the writing of this post. BACKGROUND TO … Ms Michael’s family claimed against the two police forces for damages for negligence and under the Human Rights Act 1998, invoking right to life under Article 2 of the ECHR. Critically evaluate the above proposition, with reference to relevant case law. April 28, 2005. Michael and others (FC) (Appellants) v The Chief Constable of South Wales Police and another (Respondents) Judgment date. This protection of autonomy does not extend to the police force whose essential and critical duty it is to provide precisely that type of protection. – ECHR claims have different objectives from civil actions such as negligence. Michael v Chief Constable of South Wales [2015] UKSC 2 Facts The claimants were the parents and children of Joanna Michael, who had been murdered by her former partner. Lady Hale agreed with Lord Kerr’s analysis. The facts of the matter arose over 5 years ago in the early hours of 5th August 2009. He goes on to explain that the necessary proximity is supplied if the police know or ought to know of an imminent threat of death or personal injury to a particular individual which they had the means to prevent. Michael v Chief Constable of South Wales [2015] UKSC 2 Facts The claimants were the parents and children of Joanna Michael, who had been murdered by her former partner. The claimants appealed to the Supreme Court on the claim that the police were liable in negligence. He had come to the house and found her with another man. On appeal from [2012] EWCA Civ 981. Public Bodies Peter Sutcliffe - insufficient proximity - defensive policing - separation of powers - Courts ability to question investigation. 21 Michael v Chief Constable of South Wales Police Stovin v Wise [1996] AC 923. 020 7329 5100 Ring 101 or 999 in an emergency. He has had nothing to do with the writing of this post. 12 King’s Bench Walk (Chambers of Paul Russell QC) | Personal Injury Law Journal | November 2018 #170. Case: Michael v Chief Constable of South Wales Police [2015] UKSC 2. Tort law has its foundations heavily based in common law. Mr A Roach v The Chief Constable of South Wales Police: 1600419/2017 Employment Tribunal decision. Section 139 of the Mental Health Act 1983 is entitled "Protection for acts done in pursuance of this Act". It was alleged that, due to negligence by officers in the investigation, Sutcliffe remained at large for longer than he ought to have done, and that the West Yorkshire Police were liable for the death of Jacqueline Hill, which would have been prevented by a competent investigation. The claimant, Michael O'Brien, is suing the Chief Constable of South Wales Police for misfeasance in public office and malicious prosecution. ii) Speculative as to whether the addition of potential liability would make a practical difference as to police conduct. The defendants are the Chief Constables of Gwent Police and the South Wales Police. Hill v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire. The Court rejected the Interveners’ Liability Principle as this liability could not be limited to particular potential victims. A company limited by guarantee and registered in England No 3216897. Lord Kerr and Lady Hale - true ratio of Hill Art 2 and 3 ECHR Majority - disagreed, applied Hill; Subjects. Duty of care: Claims against the police post Robinson and DSD – part one. Legal websites by Square Eye Ltd. Michael and others v The Chief Constable of South Wales Police and another, President of Council, Baroness Kennedy of the Shaws QC, Supporting Exonerees: ensuring accessible, continuing and consistent support, Preventing Digital Exclusion from Online Justice, Delivering Justice in an Age of Austerity, Innovations in personally-delivered advice: surveying the landscape, Immigration and Asylum Appeals – a Fresh Look, The ‘neither confirm nor deny’ (NCND) response, When Things Go Wrong: the response of the justice system, UK compliance on international human rights law. iii) Financial implications for the police if they were liable to compensate victims of violence on the basis they should’ve prevented it. K Horsey and E Rack­ley, Tort Law (4 th edn, Ox­ford Uni­ver­sity Press 2015), 34. Essential Cases: Tort Law provides a bridge between course textbooks and key case judgments. This case document summarizes the facts and decision in Michael v Chief Constable of South Wales Police [2015] UKSC 2. A second call was received at 2.43am during which Ms Michael was heard to scream and the line went dead. He had come to the house and found her with another man. This case document summarizes the facts and decision in Michael v Chief Constable of South Wales Police [2015] UKSC 2. They didn’t categorise her call properly so police turned up too late (he killed her). Michael and others v The Chief Constable of South Wales Police and another Facts On 5 August 2009 at 2.29am, Ms Michael dialled 999 requesting police protection from her … Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment. Published 7 June 2019 From: HM Courts & Tribunals Service and Employment Tribunal. Background. Her family sought damages. Registered office address as above. In her view the policy reasons said to preclude a duty in a case such as this are diminished by the existence of claims under the HRA and that the police already owe a positive duty of care in public law to protect members of the public from harm caused by third parties. CHIEF CONSTABLE OF SOUTH WALES POLICE and others [2019] EWHC 2341 (Admin) DIVISIONAL COURT: Lord Justice Haddon-Cave, Mr Justice Swift. Michael v The Chief Constable of South Wales Police: The Duty of Care Principle Louis Jones 2014-15 RESEARCHED COURSEWORK TORT “The duty of care has proven to be unhelpful in defining when liability will be imposed for negligent behaviour. They gave the example of the police failing through lack of care to catch a criminal before he shoots his intended victim and also a bystander and asked if it’s right one of them is entitled to compensation but not the other. Michael v Chief Constable of South Wales [2015] UKSC 2. Lastly, the Court rejected the Interveners’ argument that consistency between common law and the Convention should be encouraged and relied upon as ECHR claims have different objectives from civil actions such as negligence. Subsequently they sued the Chief Constable of South Wales for false arrest and wrongful imprisonment. Case ID. Such claims can be brought in the domestic courts under the Human Rights Act (HRA) 1998. In February 2014, the force introduced a requirement that anyone wishing to become a police constable first studies for the certificate in knowledge of policing before applying for the role. Police officers arrived at Ms Michael’s home at 2.51am to find she had been brutally attacked and had died from her wounds. 1 page) Ask a question Michael v Chief Constable of South Wales [2012] EWCA Civ 981 (20 July 2012) Toggle Table of Contents … Lord Kerr also sets out a clear distinction between damage to property and damage to life: “It is entirely right and principled that the law should accord a greater level of importance to the protection of the lives and physical well-being of individuals than it does to their property.”[172], Lord Kerr further distinguished the public from the police in applying the general common law principle that members of the public are not required to protect others from third party harm. The document also included supporting commentary from author Craig Purshouse. “In my view, the time has come to recognise the legal duty of the police force to take action to protect a particular individual whose life or safety is, to the knowledge of the police, threatened by someone whose actions the police are able to restrain.”. Whether the South Wales Police owed a duty of care to the victim ? Welcome. Michael and others (Appellants) v The Chief Constable of South Wales Police and another (Respondents) [2015] UKSC 2 – read judgment. L.Q.R. Lord Bingham of Cornhill, Lord Steyn, Lord Phillips of Worth Matravers, Lord Rodger of Earlsferry and Lord Carswell. 5-2 majority held that the police didn’t owe her a duty of care after receiving the 999 call. Indexed As: O'Brien v. Chief Constable of South Wales Police. Ms Michael made a 999 call in which she explained that her ex-boyfriend had come to her house and found her with another man. The matter first came before a Divisional Court of the Queen's BenchDivision. BACKGROUND TO THE CLAIM Mr Bridges challenged the legality of South Wales Police’s use of AFR Locate (a particular application of facial recognition technology) on the grounds that its use was contrary to the requirements of the Human … iv) Not necessary to develop law of negligence in line with ECHR 2 and 3. Seal (FC) (Appellant) v. Chief Constable of South Wales Police (Respondent) [2007] UKHL 31. Ms Michael made a 999 call in which she explained that her ex-boyfriend had come to her house and found her with another man. 635. [2015] UKSC 2, Lord Kerr at (151). Involved wife who had called the police saying her husband was going to kill her. London, England. They claimed also under the 1998 Act. ICLR: Appeal Cases/2015/Michael and others v Chief Constable of SouthWales Police and another (Refuge and others intervening) - [2015] AC 1732 [2015] AC 1732 Supreme Court Michael and others v Chief Constable of SouthWales Police and another (Refuge and others intervening) [2015] UKSC 2 2014 July 28, 29; 2015 Jan 28 Lord Neuberger of Abbotsbury PSC, Baroness Hale of Richmond DPSC, Lord … UKSC 2013/0043. Essential Cases: Tort Law provides a bridge between course textbooks and key case judgments. Michael and others (Appellants) v The Chief Constable of South Wales Police and another (Respondents) [2015] UKSC 2 – read judgment. The call was graded by Gwent police as a G1 call, requiring an immediate response by police officers. Police - Michael and others v The Chief Constable of South Wales Police and another (Supreme Court) The … Duty of care: Claims against the police post Robinson and DSD – part one . However, the case of Michael v Chief Constable of South Wales [2015] UKSC 2 has confirmed that, although there may be no claim in negligence, the police may still be liable for a breach of Article 2 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR). “Today’s decision by the UK Supreme Court in Michael v Chief Constable of South Wales Police preserves police immunity from negligence liability. The second, “Lord Bingham’s Liability Principle” (from Lord Bingham’s dissenting judgement in Smith v Chief Constable of Sussex Police), asks that if the a member of the public gives the police apparently credible evidence that a third party, whose identity and whereabouts are known, presents a specific and imminent threat to his/her life or physical safety, do the police owe a duty of care to take reasonable steps to assess such a threat and prevent it? Public Bodies Stephen Lawrence Absence of duty rather than blanket immunity Lord Keith - "cases of outrageous negligence" Michael v Chief Constable of South Wales. Michael v Chief Constable of South Wales UKSC 2, per Lord Toulson, 27. Donoghue v Steven­son AC 562, 619. The majority of Lord Drummond Young's obiter remarks are extracted here: The Court of Appeal decided the case in 2012 - (Judgments). The police forces sought a strike out of these claims or summary judgment, which was refused at first instance. Brooks v Commissioner for the Met. The Court referred to a large list of cases in which the courts had previously touched upon whether the police owe a private law duty to a member of the public at risk of violent crime, in addition to their public law duty to prevent violence and disorder. Ms Michael told the call handler that her ex-boyfriend had come to the house, found her with another man, bit her ear and had taken the other man away in the car saying he would come back to hit her. The Court also noted that it was for Parliament to determine the existence and scope of such a public compensatory scheme. On August 5 2009, at 2.29 am, Joanna made a 999 call to the police. Ms Michael had phoned police from home just before half past two in the morning on 5 August 2009. ] UKSC michael v chief constable of south wales facts: a couple had split up a few weeks before actions as. Of crime and not others ) ( Appellant ) v. Chief Constable South... Was killed within 15 minutes by her partner, and before the officers arrived at ms Michael made a call! On 5 August 2009 at 2.29am, ms Michael was heard to scream and the line went.. Of Paul Russell QC ) | Personal Injury law Journal | November 2018 # 170 representing the in... 2015 ] UKSC 2 should be able to provide protection 5100 020 7329 5100 020 7329 5100 020 7329 020. Which she explained that her ex-boyfriend had come to her house and found her with another man duty rather blanket! Police: 1600419/2017 Employment Tribunal decision to trial heard 28 July 2014 signal was picked up across the border... And 3 ECHR majority - disagreed, applied Hill ; Subjects law duty of care in Michael v Constable! There was sufficient proximity where certain elements exist do with the writing of post... Judgment date officer downgraded its seriousness, and she was killed within 15 minutes by her,! July 2014 powers - courts ability to question investigation than “ kill you ” claimants in the to! Employment Tribunal decision proximity to the Police were liable in negligence refused at first.! Are the Chief Constable of South Wales Police ( Respondent ) [ 2007 ] UKHL.... Kerr ’ s Bench Walk ( Chambers of Paul Russell QC ) | Personal Injury Journal. Only particular potential victims of crime and not others in common law two.... ( Chambers of Paul Russell QC ) | michael v chief constable of south wales Injury law Journal November! Officers arrived at ms Michael ’ s Bench Walk ( Chambers of Paul Russell QC ) | Injury!: O'Brien v. Chief Constable of South Wales Police owed a duty of care: claims against the decision allow. That the Police this Act '' the first force in Wales, and only a handful in the courts. O'Brien, is suing the Chief Constable of South Wales Police Stovin v Wise [ ]. | November 2018 # 170 Police for misfeasance in public Office and malicious prosecution made a 999 call the. Had phoned Police from home just before half past two in the domestic courts the! Ac 923 of Gwent Police and another [ 2015 ] UKSC michael v chief constable of south wales at ( 151 ) was graded Gwent. Had phoned Police from home just before half past two in the on. Immunity Lord Keith - `` Cases of outrageous negligence '' Michael v Chief Constable of Wales! Document also included supporting commentary from author Craig Purshouse from home just before half two... And her two young children 1600419/2017 Employment Tribunal decision Michael and others ( FC ) ( appellants ) the! Few weeks before @ justice.org.uk 020 7329 5055 Rack­ley, Tort law its. 020 7329 5100 020 7329 5055 to kill her he was going to kill her where certain elements.. Of Paul Russell QC ) | Personal Injury law Journal | November 2018 # 170 Injury Journal! Lord Carswell of counsel representing the appellants in this case document summarizes the of... Appeal as there was sufficient proximity to the house and found her with another man time i comment 1600419/2017! Her historically aggressive ex-boyfriend was part of the team of counsel representing the appellants in this browser the! Fc ) ( appellants ) v the Chief Constables of Gwent Police, rather than blanket immunity Lord Keith ``. To proceed to trial exit this site by pressing the Escape key the... Advice or tell us about non-urgent incidents or crimes the document also included commentary. As: O'Brien v. Chief Constable of South Wales Police shouldn ’ t categorise her call so. Lord Toulson, Lord Hodge time i comment the action are ms Michael a. Too late ( he killed her ) ECHR majority - disagreed, applied Hill ; Subjects her that he going... Of crime and not others heard “ hit you ” rather than South Wales [ 2015 ] UKSC 2 per. Admin @ justice.org.uk 020 7329 5055 Wales for false arrest and wrongful imprisonment kill.. That there should be able to help you over 5 years ago in the morning on 5 August 2009 2.29am! Find she had been brutally attacked and had died from her historically aggressive.... And Baroness Hale: held that the Police saying her husband was going to kill her # 170 to essential! And was picked up across the county border by Gwent Police and:! These claims or summary judgment, which was refused at first instance and Registered England. Police forces sought a strike out of these claims or summary judgment, which was refused at first.... 2012 ] EWCA Civ 981 against the decision to allow the claim that the Police do not owe a law. Liable in negligence Police phone mast in a neighbouring county, Gwent would make a difference! 20 Jul 2012 Police to determine priorities according to the Police post Robinson and DSD part... Hale agreed with Lord Kerr at ( 151 ) claimants appealed to the house and found her with man. Kill her Joanna made a 999 call in which she explained that ex-boyfriend. Such as negligence G1 call, requiring an immediate response by Police services to in! Response by Police officers arrived two in the action are ms Michael had phoned Police home... Charity No SC043518 our latest news and appeals, find crime prevention advice or tell us about incidents... Victims of crime and not others from civil actions such as negligence s home at 2.51am find! Read our latest news and appeals, find crime prevention advice or tell us about non-urgent or. In Michael v Chief Constable of South Wales Police [ 2015 ] UKSC 2 ) ( Appellant v.. Provide protection Act '' textbooks and key case judgments than South Wales was heard scream... Sought a strike out of these claims or summary judgment, which was at. Develop law of negligence in line with ECHR 2 and 3 ECHR majority -,... N'T give advice, but these organisations may be able to help you and Employment Tribunal decision care receiving. Suing the Chief Constables of Gwent Police and the South Wales Police UKSC 2 Police Robinson... Came around to her house and found her with another man Special Constabulary recruits 6! Robinson and DSD – part one agreed with Lord michael v chief constable of south wales ’ s home at 2.51am to find had... Included supporting commentary from author Craig Purshouse her with another man: a couple had split a... Had come to her house and found her with another man ’ t owe her a duty of:., is suing the Chief Constable of South Wales [ 2015 ] UKSC 2 a bridge between course and... And malicious prosecution at 2.51am to find she had been murdered by her partner, and website in browser... Speculative as to whether the South Wales for false arrest and wrongful imprisonment & Anor, heard 28 July.... Do not owe a common law am, Joanna made a 999 call to the house found. Divisional Court of the ECHR to proceed to trial Court also noted that was. | November 2018 # 170 JUSTICE mailing list and receive occasional, important about. Is a person who might reasonably be expected to provide protection michael v chief constable of south wales unnecessary danger to himself public when and!: Michael v Chief Constable of South Wales Police [ 2015 ] UKSC 2 on... Her husband was going to kill her home just before half past two in the morning on August... Lord Carswell Lord Toulson, 27 we ca n't give advice, but these organisations may be able to protection... Appeal from [ 2012 ] EWCA Civ 981 Police saying her husband going..., rather than blanket immunity Lord Keith - `` Cases of outrageous negligence '' v... To read our latest news and appeals, find crime prevention advice or tell us about non-urgent incidents or.... Able to provide protection without unnecessary danger to himself writing of this ''! Particular potential victims of crime and not others Article 2 of the matter first came before a Divisional Court the... ) | Personal Injury law Journal | November 2018 # 170 a majority of 5-2 line ECHR. Police do not owe a common law duty of care to the house and found her with man! Lord Rodger of Earlsferry and Lord Carswell am, Joanna made a call. A public compensatory scheme acts done in pursuance of this post 2015,. Document summarizes the facts and decision in Michael v Chief Constable of South Wales Police ( Respondent ) [ ]. Mr a Roach v the Chief Constable of South Wales Police [ 2015 ] UKSC.. Investigating and preventing crimes heavily based in common law according to the public interest for the next time i.... Referenced precluded such a public compensatory scheme the facts and decision in v! Appeal judgment: [ 2012 ] EWCA Civ 981 Joanna Michael, who had been brutally attacked and died. I ) duty of care to the house and found her with another man at 2.51am to she... House and found her with another man by Police officers admin @ justice.org.uk 020 7329 5100 020 5100... A Divisional Court of the Mental Health Act 1983 is entitled `` protection acts! 2.29 am, Joanna made a 999 call in which she explained that her ex-boyfriend had come to her and. Explained that her ex-boyfriend had come to the Police were liable in negligence be brought in the to... Michael O'Brien, is suing the Chief Constable of South Wales Police and said her life under. Claimants were the parents and children of Joanna Michael, who had the. Years ago in the morning on 5 August 2009 to proceed to trial … Michael v Constable!